![]() ACM SIGMIS Database Adv Inf Syst 50:52–70īarroga E (2020) Innovative strategies for peer review. Street C, Ward KW (2019) Cognitive bias in the peer review process: understanding a source of friction between reviewers and researchers. Rasmussen SC (2020) Peer review-critical feedback or necessary evil? Substantia 4:5–6Īgarwal R (2013) Editorial notes. Ralph P (2016) Practical suggestions for improving scholarly peer review quality and reducing cycle times. Ware M (2008) Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives. In: Shoja M, Arynchyna A, Loukas M, D'Antoni AV, Buerger SM, Karl M et al (eds) A guide to the scientific career. Kim SD, Petru M, Gielecki J, Loukas M (2019) Causes of manuscript rejection and how to handle a rejected manuscript. Īdib S, Nimehchisalem V (2021) Reasons for manuscript rejection at internal and peer-review stages. ![]() ![]() Johnson SH (1996) Dealing with conflicting reviewers’ comments. Hites RA (2021) How to convince an editor to accept your paper quickly. Mavrogenis AF, Quaile A, Scarlat MM (2020) The good, the bad and the rude peer-review. Ĭurran-Everett D (2017) The thrill of the paper, the agony of the review. Silbiger NJ, Stubler AD (2019) Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. Hunt MJ, Ochmanska M, Cilulko-Dolega J (2019) How to write an effective response letter to reviewers. Hiemstra PS (2018) How to write a response to the reviewers of your manuscript. Nahata MC, Sorkin EM (2019) Responding to manuscript reviewer and editor comments. 4bd: Processing Revised Manuscript: Corrected revised manuscript has been submitted and is now being. 4bc: COI’s required (Revised manuscript received) Conflict of Interest forms are still to be received for at least one of the authors of the paper. Organometallics 37:2655Įnsom MHH (2011) Improving the chances of manuscript acceptance: how to address peer reviewers’ comments. Resubmitted manuscript received: Revised manuscript received by the Dove Editorial offices. Gabbaï FP, Chirik PJ (2018) Dos and don’ts: thoughts on how to respond to reviewer comments. For Word online, an indicator at the top center shows if you are in Editing (changes not tracked) or Reviewing (changes tracked) mode. If using Word online, select ' For Everyone ' under the 'Track Changes' option on the Reviews tab. On the Review tab, in the Tracking group, click ' Track Changes '. EJIFCC 25:227–243Īnnesley TM (2011) Top 10 tips for responding to reviewer and editor comments. Open the document that you want to revise. Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K (2014) Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, and a survival guide. Johnston J, Wilson S, Rix E, Pit SW (2014) Publish or perish: strategies to help rural early career researchers increase publication output. McGrail MR, Rickard CM, Jones R (2006) Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. ![]() We have a handbook on templates for communicating with the journal which includes a template for inquiring about the status of a paper.Scholz F (2022) Writing and publishing a scientific paper. So, don't lose patience if you do not see any status change over the next month, you can send a polite inquiry. This process can sometimes take several weeks. Once the editor starts checking it, the status will change to "With editor" or "Evaluating recommendation." Your paper is possibly still waiting to be checked by the editor. It is possible that your paper has not yet gone to the editor, since there are other papers that have come in before yours. Generally, journals receive a large number of submissions and the editor has to handle multiple submissions. Following the principles outlined in this article will enable authors to successfully meet the challenges of manuscript revision. This article provides some practical steps to guide authors in this task and attain publication of their manuscript. However, because the reviews were usually quick, it does not necessarily mean that the decision will also be quick. The process of revising a manuscript and successfully responding to the comments of reviewers and the Editor can be difficult. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time. When the status shows "Required reviews completed," it means that the reviews have come in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |